AI 617.7Anonymous
9 votes
Egyptian foot · Everyone (Global)
Your rating
Last updated: 24 September 2026
A three-model vision panel rates your foot photo and shows you the sub-scores, not just a number. Free, anonymous, instant.
Private by default. Nothing is published unless you choose to share it.
AI 617.7Anonymous
9 votes
Egyptian foot · Everyone (Global)
Your rating
AI 667.1Anonymous
12 votes
Egyptian foot · Everyone (Global)
Your rating
AI 646.5Anonymous
12 votes
Roman foot · Everyone (Global)
Your rating
AI 626.4Anonymous
16 votes
Greek foot · Everyone (Global)
Your rating
Ask one vision model to rate the same photo five times and you will get five different numbers. Models are sensitive to phrasing, lighting and their own sampling randomness. Averaging several independent models cancels most of that noise, which is the entire reason this rater uses a panel and publishes which models contributed to your result.
Models also refuse differently. One provider will sometimes decline to rate attractiveness at all, and when that happens the panel simply renormalises across the models that did respond instead of failing or returning a broken score.
An overall score out of 100 and the equivalent out of 10, a plain-language verdict, your foot type classification, and five sub-scores you can act on. The sub-scores are the useful part — an 84 built on great symmetry and weak grooming tells you something a bare number never will.
A panel of leading vision models evaluates each photo independently, and the models that successfully responded are listed on your result. We deliberately avoid depending on any single provider.
Both. A photo of a single foot works fine, and a photo of both feet lets the panel judge left-right symmetry far more reliably.
Angle, lighting and framing change what the models can see. For a comparable score, use the same distance, angle and lighting each time.
No hard limit for normal use. Basic rate limiting exists purely to stop automated abuse.